Government assisted monopoly is basically using government's coercive power to deny a party to chose from alternatives. When government forces ISPs to be "neut

Government assisted monopoly is basically using government's coercive power to deny a party to chose from alternatives. When government forces ISPs to be "neutral" an forgo the additional revenue it essentially denying the ISPs to exercise their innovation to benefit the voters. There is no difference between government mandating net neutrality and government banning Uber to help local Taxi companies. I think people mistake net neutrality for fairness because they think a lot of people benefit.