>It's just odd that you can't even understand how someone could see a moral component to it. I'd assume they tried and failed. It's the simplest explanation. O

>It's just odd that you can't even understand how someone could see a moral component to it. I'd assume they tried and failed. It's the simplest explanation. On the other hand, attributing a moral component to it implies deliberate malfeasance (such as deceiving investors), which would require evidence. So, in the absence of that evidence, attributing a moral component to it would seem hard to differentiate from conspiracy theory.