Like many "big risks"* in life, I think earlier is better for most people. But I also think it's very challenging to give advice to other people about it vs un

Like many "big risks"* in life, I think earlier is better for most people. But I also think it's very challenging to give advice to other people about it vs understanding my own values and talking about my own experiences. Personally, I joined one right out of grad school. I also joined with the intention of being a founder myself one day, and learning things that would directly benefit that. I think this is a common rationale. While there is a bias toward twenty-somethings in startups, I wouldn't let that discourage you. I think it's just that the risk of "I might not have a job in 6 months" is more palatable when you're: young, not used to making (much) money, don't have a mortgage, or kids. I don't mention any of these things as reasons to discourage you, just to think about a hypothesis for the bias. By the way, PG wrote a nice essay on pros / cons called A Student's Guide to Startups [1], which is really practical for anyone considering founding or working for an early-stage startup. While much of it is about founding your own company, there is a ton of overlap between that and joining someone else's early stage company. *I do not consider working for a seed-stage startup as big of a risk as it's made out to be. [1]: http://paulgraham.com/mit.html http://paulgraham.com/mit.html