3 ms·
Please use the data that you gather responsibly. There are some people who abuse the system (who I hope you identify), and also some people who really should h
by Retr0spectrum 10y ago
Please use the data that you gather responsibly.
There are some people who abuse the system (who I hope you identify), and also some people who really should have the right to be forgotten.
As far as I can tell, using a US based VPN/proxy does not censor results - at least, it does not show the message.
Therefore, you just need to cross-reference the results from different geographic regions. However, it will be difficult to tell whether a certain result is missing due to censorship, or the fact that result rankings are slightly different for different countries.
Once you find a "suspicious" result, I guess you could try searching direct quotes from the article - If it doesn't show up in those results, then it's probably censored.
This process will need to be automated, if you want to check every name.
- matt4077 10y ago> Once you find a "suspicious" result, I guess you could try searching direct quotes from the article I believe google only removes the results from searches for the specific name. The page can still show up if you search for something else. Other than that: +1 for your request for responsibility. I disagree with the court ruling, but having the right to publish some information doesn't always mean it's a good idea. Google has details on a few specific requests. They include "high-ranking corrupt politician" (not removed) as well as "stalking victim's home address" (removed).