The U.S. absolutely has jurisdiction over crimes committed against computer systems within its territory. Why would you think U.S. law enforcement does not have

The U.S. absolutely has jurisdiction over crimes committed against computer systems within its territory. Why would you think U.S. law enforcement does not have jurisdiction over a criminal who committed crimes against U.S. property and persons located in U.S. territory? I see comments like this one in a lot of threads involving prosecutions - off the cuff statements that "well, it FEELS like things should work this way, rather than the way they actually do." If you're not an expert on the legal issues at hand, perhaps consider refraining from making these types of comments.