4 ms·

Unvealing prettyLoader, a solution aimed to unify ajax loaders

• nkm 17y ago
  Very nice, it's actually how background processing notification should look in web applications. With a PNG and sprite animation it could be really pretty.
  • scaron 17y ago
    Yah though of using a APNG for animation, but it's just not widely supported enough right now. It's in my to-do list for sure.
    • nkm 17y ago
      Yes, that's too bad... The prospects aren't good either, it seems that Webkit won't support it anytime soon and who knows about IE. Good to know :)
• alttab 17y ago
  The first thing I thought was, "could I disable it for specific calls?" Sometimes, you may not want a loader by the mouse, especially if the request doesn't need a response. (Think setting a checkbox, or something that makes a short call and it's distracting to have a loading symbol) Looks really cool and I hate having to work in the loading notifier on each call where it makes sense. I suppose the other issue is 'covered' by the delay? Still, gimme a flag and we're set.
  • walkon 17y ago
    I think you can avoid having it display on every ajax call by setting the bind_to_ajax = false. Then, just manually call the show() or hide() when you want to. Documentation: http://www.no-margin-for-errors.com/projects/prettyloader/documentation/ http://www.no-margin-for-errors.com/projects/prettyloader/do...
• tensafefrogs 17y ago
  > Unvealing prettyLoader, a solution aimed to unify ajax loaders Do ajax preloaders have a history of having too much veal?
• ionfish 17y ago
  How many loaders can it possibly unify if it's a plugin for a specific framework?
  • scaron 17y ago
    I'm the developer of this. I built it using the most widely used framework and plan on releasing it for others based on the feedback. Didn't want to spend time converting it for multiple framework if there's no real interest.