Sorry to say this but you're talking out of your ####. All the research from expiercal studies mostly all show that static vs dynamic languages all correlated

Sorry to say this but you're talking out of your ####. All the research from expiercal studies mostly all show that static vs dynamic languages all correlated with a Expertise reversal effect. This is for beginners not experience programmers. That at the start of the studies for the first 8 to 9 months novices have a negative correlation with the speed of development work with a statically typed language. After 8 to 9 months they gain a singificant boost from static type language. Source to backup my statement and resource if you're interested @ Susan_hall Functional Geekery Episode 55 – Andreas Stefik https://www.functionalgeekery.com/episode-55-andreas-stefik/#t=28:27.637 https://www.functionalgeekery.com/episode-55-andreas-stefik/... Secondly another study that was published for Polymorphism in Python from the website (neverworkintheory) Polymorphism in Python http://neverworkintheory.org/2016/06/13/polymorphism-in-python.html http://neverworkintheory.org/2016/06/13/polymorphism-in-pyth... Gives the qoute: `Our findings show that the receiver in 97.4% of all call-sites in the average program can be described by a single static type using a conservative nominal type system using single inheritance. If we add parametric polymorphism to the type system, we increase the typeability to 97.9% of all call-sites for the average program.` I could qoute other resources to backup my statements though if you want to have a skype coversation I'm up for a talk.