4 ms·
If you want to prove a scientist wrong, present evidence to the contrary rather than personal innuendos and hypotheses / observations without proof.
by tzmudzin 10y ago
If you want to prove a scientist wrong, present evidence to the contrary rather than personal innuendos and hypotheses / observations without proof.
- arde 10y agoThe Scientific American article [1] cited as first reference in the paper is quite interesting. [1] http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/evidence-rebuts-chomsky-s-theory-of-language-learning/ http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/evidence-rebuts-ch...
- pekk 10y agoThis is a good criticism of a number of Chomsky's polemical papers.
- PavlovsCat 10y ago"A number", as is usual with Chomsky, being a bunch of stuff you're not going to quote, because you'd likely end up eating all of it. There's gotta be a nest somewhere.