3 ms·
Because I'm slow at work.. If we say the new generation iPhones have a 3,000mah battery, batteries are charged fully once per day, and that 100 million people
by mikeyouse 10y ago
Because I'm slow at work..
If we say the new generation iPhones have a 3,000mah battery, batteries are charged fully once per day, and that 100 million people in the US have iPhones:
3,000mah x 3.8v = 11.4 watt-hours to fully charge a phone -- at $0.15/kWh, this equates to a daily expense of ~$0.002 to charge your phone. Annually, this is $0.62. If wireless charging were 50% efficient, it would still cost under a dollar annually to charge your phone.
On a bigger scale:
11.4Wh * 365 days * 100M phones = 416 billion watt-hours annually to charge all the iPhones in the US. A 50% efficiency loss would equate to a difference of 208 billion Wh.
Enercon makes a monster wind turbine called the E-126 that has a 7.6mW generator attached. With a modest 40% capacity factor, you would only need 8 additional wind turbines to make up for every iPhone user in the US switching to wireless charging.
- simcop2387 10y agoActually a 50% efficiency loss would double the energy requirements to 800+ billion watt hours. Your original calculation is right for 100% efficiency in charging over wires.
- mikeyouse 10y agoAh! Good point. I can't edit but double the turbines.
- antocv 10y agoHow much to make up for all the cancers people would get with increased radiation all around them?
- adevine 10y agoNon-ionizing radiation does not cause cancer