4 ms·
Paul Reynolds, who worked at uBeam, demolishes Energous planned business model through physics [1] [2]. My opinion (and a lot of other investors) is that Energo
by dantiberian 10y ago
Paul Reynolds, who worked at uBeam, demolishes Energous planned business model through physics [1] [2]. My opinion (and a lot of other investors) is that Energous is a scam [3] [4]. Their device cannot get FCC approval to transmit at the levels that they need to to send power, so it's a complete non-starter.
[1]: http://liesandstartuppr.blogspot.co.nz/2016/04/those-other-guys-pt-1.html http://liesandstartuppr.blogspot.co.nz/2016/04/those-other-g...
[2]: http://liesandstartuppr.blogspot.co.nz/2016/04/those-other-guys-pt-ii.html http://liesandstartuppr.blogspot.co.nz/2016/04/those-other-g...
[3]: http://seekingalpha.com/article/3964405-wattup-mini-will-save-energous http://seekingalpha.com/article/3964405-wattup-mini-will-sav...
[4]: http://seekingalpha.com/article/3960298-stunning-admission-energous http://seekingalpha.com/article/3960298-stunning-admission-e...
- 2AF3 10y agoDo you think uBeam is also a scam / impossible technology to deliver?
- deleted 10y ago[deleted]
- LiesNStartupPR 10y agoPlanning on doing 'Apple compliance testing' is a zero cost thing to do, and has no effect on getting a deal with Apple. People seem to read into this statement what they want it to say - given Energous is a publicly traded company and their statements are covered by SEC rules, then take what they say at absolute face value, no more and no less.