I addressed this elsewhere (on your 'ask for criticisms' post), but I think I misunderstood your intent. As a rejection of Musk/Gates/Hawking, I definitely end

I addressed this elsewhere (on your 'ask for criticisms' post), but I think I misunderstood your intent. As a rejection of Musk/Gates/Hawking, I definitely endorse this. Those voices are pushing a questionably-informed view of the topic (Gates a bit less so?) that's had far too much public influence. Something (the title? my own biases?) led me to conclude that you were trying a larger response to the AI community, which is what I objected to so strongly. That's a great summary of the point (as I meant it). I saw that it was addressed at the end. I still came away with the feeling that the middle was irrelevant in light of it (again, perhaps not if you're responding to Musk), and the response was inadequate, but this may be about scope and intended audience.