4 ms·
Obviously we all know the paperclip example, you can't just quote it and call that good. Countless people have made objections to this..
by soared 10y ago
Obviously we all know the paperclip example, you can't just quote it and call that good. Countless people have made objections to this..
- cynoclast 10y agoSo list some?
- csbrooks 10y agoTo me, it seems to refute the argument in the article: that AI has to have some kind of "will" in order to be dangerous. Because AI doesn't "desire" to take over the world, it can't harm us. I believe The paperclip example shows that isn't the case.
- vorotato 10y agoOr to simplify, I can mangle my arm with heavy machinery without it wanting to harm me. It's somewhat ridiculous that people view conscious things as more harmful, if anything they've shown to be less harmful. Before you throw the nuke example at me, please consider we have yet to see what a being who was not conscious but capable of nuking would do.