3 ms·
>It takes a lot effort to explain how this: >has much better art than this: ... Shitty dither. That didn't take long. Even in Bubsy, the things that weren't
by wccrawford 10y ago
>It takes a lot effort to explain how this:
>has much better art than this:
... Shitty dither. That didn't take long. Even in Bubsy, the things that weren't dithered weren't nearly as bad as the ones that were.
It has other problems, too, but they would become more apparent if the artist had refused to dither. Then they'd be a lot easier to talk about, such as the horrible shapes for everything except bubsy himself.
The problem with that background in bubsy wasn't the "pixel art", it was the art. I'm betting that artist couldn't draw well in any medium.
- veli_joza 10y agoFor me, it doesn't work because background is too vibrant and clashing with characters. If you would de-saturate the background (or use only cold colors), I suspect just that small change would make the art work.