I mean, this doesn't really seem like the grandest news. It could've been safely inferred based on the releases at the time: http://www.wsj.com/articles/mobiley

I mean, this doesn't really seem like the grandest news. It could've been safely inferred based on the releases at the time: http://www.wsj.com/articles/mobileye-ends-partnership-with-tesla-1469544028 http://www.wsj.com/articles/mobileye-ends-partnership-with-t... > Mobileye said it would no longer provide its computer chips and algorithms to Tesla after a current contract ends due to disagreements about how the technology was deployed. But it's good to have the exact reason Mobileye decided against renewing the contract in writing. I'm still keen to see how Volvo's system ends up since they (if I recall correctly) are the only car company which has so far indicated they would accept responsibility for incidents caused by their driverless system: http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-34475031 http://www.bbc.com/news/technology-34475031 -- hopefully this'll compel their engineering teams to focus more on safety rather than MVP. I do wonder whether both Tesla and SpaceX are seeing the issues they're seeing because of the abysmal work-life balance at both companies. Great successes on both sides, but there are increases in risks of catastrophic failure in products from both companies which have already been realized. I'm sure work life balance isn't the only reason, but it wouldn't surprise me if Musk's inability to personally burn out isn't actually shared by the vast majority of his engineers.