3 ms·
>and then they threw it under a bus. They didn't just do this "because." There were sound technical reasons to do so. Angular made the correct decision, in my
by popmystack 10y ago
>and then they threw it under a bus.
They didn't just do this "because." There were sound technical reasons to do so. Angular made the correct decision, in my opinion, and decided to cut its losses immediately and right the wrongs within the framework.
- boubiyeah 10y agoWell... I would argue that angular 2 is not even better than angular 1 so it will probably happen again :p It's more performant, but that's about it. It's insane, java/spring like complex for no reason.
- popmystack 10y agoReally? So mobile support, change detection revamp, TypeScript, the removal of $scope, and all the routing changes are all just "meh" to you?
- Roboprog 10y agoWellllllll... I does make me want to learn React & React Mobile if I have to largely start over, anyway. Not saying ng-2 is not an improvement, just that it's a big change to take in.