4 ms·
so the unspoken thing seems to be that they kept the same JVM arguments as java 7 and that caused problems in java 8? and they had a JVM argument that was setti
by osi 10y ago
so the unspoken thing seems to be that they kept the same JVM arguments as java 7 and that caused problems in java 8? and they had a JVM argument that was setting a value to the same as the default?
- billsmithaustin 10y agoWe knew to adjust other JVM settings (e.g. PermGen replaced by Metaspace) but we overlooked that (1) we used a non-default max codecache size and (2) the default for that setting was 3x higher for Java 8. An unfortunate thing about using non-default JVM settings is that you need to scrutinize them every time you switch Java versions. If I ever go through this again, I will know to pay more attention to every JVM setting we override.
- osi 10y agoah, so you had tuned JRE7 to use 64mb code cache (more than default), when then became far less than the new default.