3 ms·
The GOP thing is much, much later. I don't think it's the structural explanation. And I did throw in "the election cycle" and advertising - both mean a Represen
by ArkyBeagle 10y ago
The GOP thing is much, much later. I don't think it's the structural explanation. And I did throw in "the election cycle" and advertising - both mean a Representative has no time for nothing but campaigning.
If POTUS has the "football", how is it that Congress can maintain control of the declaration of war?
My explanation for the arc of the GOP is - term limits killed it. Dead. When Newt G. et al resigned, they lost all continuity - to the point to where hacks left over from Nixon came into power. Then, using the Internet as a formation mechanism ( under the auspices of the Vast Right Wing Konspiracy of anti-Clinton attack dogs) , you had the Tea Party, which seems designed for deadlock.
It wasn't necessarily intended, but it was completely intentional.
- hga 10y agoThe GOP thing is much, much later. I don't think it's the structural explanation. Oh, agreed, but I think it's a very useful data point in studying this. And you have a point about the declaration of war, but, in our small c constitution, the president pretty much had free reign with the Navy, including of course the Marines, it took the Congress to get the Army seriously involved. Which ended with WWII (see e.g. http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/history/h_multi_sections_and_teasers/WarDeclarationsbyCongress.htm http://www.senate.gov/pagelayout/history/h_multi_sections_an...), since then we've bled mightily in the Korean "Police Action" (although be careful about the figures for the dead, the initial one was accidentally for all servicemen in any part of the world who died for any reason), Vietnam, heck, the Republican Congress explicitly refused to declare war after 9/11, and I don't think that had anything to do with the football et. al. Between official governmental suppression and co-option, the "Tea Party" never got anywhere, I'm not sure it's relevant. My explanation for the GOP is that they never got over the minority party attitude that was inculcated from 1955 or 1931 through 1995. Even when Newt and company were in theory running it, they didn't act like the party in power, see e.g. the Waco hearing(s). Of course, your Nixon era retreads theory comports perfectly with mine ... but does it, for example, explain Boehner, who's political career started in 1981? Well, he he came of age before Nixon's election, but look at the much younger Ryan, he was born a few days into Nixon's 2nd year in office....