> None of these great minds existed in an apolitical, unbiased vacuum, where they could devote themselves to nothing but free thought. If that is the claim, th

> None of these great minds existed in an apolitical, unbiased vacuum, where they could devote themselves to nothing but free thought. If that is the claim, then I agree that it is wrong. The most common criticism of Marx that I have heard is not that he is political, but that he is wrong (and perhaps incoherent). Similarly, I think that any curriculum that wants to replace the highly influential writings of Plato with another philosopher should make a case for why we should do this... an argument beyond the "inclusion" of additional points of view. I can sit at my desk and come up with a dozen different points of view. I don't think that each of those should be included in a philosophy class, in place of Plato.