4 ms·
Within the context of Go, what meaning does the Go playing machine lack?
by hackinthebochs 10y ago
Within the context of Go, what meaning does the Go playing machine lack?
- eternalban 10y agoWithin the context of Go, what meaning does the Go playing machine require? (Entire point here was to refute -- in the general case -- the notion that "meaning is critical to decision making".)
- hackinthebochs 10y agoA go playing machine certainly has to have some equivalent representation of "piece", "move", "capture", etc. These concepts have meaning within the context of Go as a set of valid board states and transitions. Understanding these fundamental features of the game is required for proper decision making within this context.
- goatlover 10y agoAll of it. It has no idea that it's playing a board game, or even what a board game is. That it's even playing Go is a human interpretation of what the machine is doing. Granted, we gave it that interpretation in the form of software instructions. But to the machine, it makes no difference.
- hackinthebochs 10y agoWithin the context of Go there is no board game, its just sets of possible states and transitions between valid states. Any feature of the game Go is encoded within this state space. The "meaning" of pieces, moves, captures, win, loss, etc are all encoded here. The go playing machine may not capture these concepts explicitly at a high level, but I'm not sure that's an important distinction. Concepts like board games, people, ancient Chinese culture, etc are all external to Go.
- eternalban 10y agoWell, actually the human context of Go includes something entirely unavailable to our mechanical constructs, yet very much an aspect of the human conscious experience: pleasure.
- goatlover 10y agoYeah, but the encoding of the possible states, etc are all based on the actual board game. We made an abstract version of the game and fed it to a learning algorithm.
- hackinthebochs 10y agoAt least with regards to the original question, your point isn't a rebuttal. That we can make an abstraction of the game and then operate on that abstraction just means the meaningful/informative portions of the game (within the context of playing the game) are contained in the abstraction. In fact, that just is what an abstraction is: taking only the necessary features for some particular context.
- goatlover 10y agohackinthebochs: Right, but the parts of the abstraction only have meaning because they are given meaning by us from the reality we abstract from.
- hackinthebochs 10y agoYou seem to be defining meaning just as what conscious entities endow something with, and so our abstract notion of Go necessarily receives its meaning from us. I don't agree with this. At its most basic, meaning just is the set of concepts and behaviors that allow correct manipulation as judged by some standard. So in this case the rules of the game have meaning within the context of a game of Go as they allow for correct manipulation of the game state. That what constitutes valid board states was derived from conscious entities isn't relevant here. The rules of Go have meaning (allow for proper manipulation) within the context of the system of valid board states and transitions between them. (you can reply to comments by clicking on the timestamp)
- aperrien 10y agoHow would I prove to you that the assembly of neurons and synapses that compose me are sentient?