4 ms·
So, it is base64 data... from there.. the 'file' utility doesn't recognize it, so (I gave up) maybe translate from unicode data (base 2^8 | 2^16 | 2^32 ) to som
by n17r4m 10y ago
So, it is base64 data... from there.. the 'file' utility doesn't recognize it, so (I gave up) maybe translate from unicode data (base 2^8 | 2^16 | 2^32 ) to something else? ("warmer/colder" would be appreciated).
- avian 10y agoIt's not a simple text encoding. Almost all byte values are present with an approximately uniform distribution. No strings of 2 bytes or longer repeat in the sequence. There is no apparent structure if you show the data as an image. If it's not just random junk, it looks non-trivial to me (which doesn't mean anything in case this is someone testing their home-brew encryption). 836 bytes is very little to work on with next to no context. Also, from poster's user name: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hobson%27s_choice_(disambiguation) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hobson%27s_choice_(disambiguat...
- Hobsons_Choice 10y agoI can assure you it's not random junk. The small size is due to the 2000 byte limit. I would be pleased to provide a larger file to work with.
- Hobsons_Choice 10y agoBase64 for posting purposes.