5 ms·
I was hoping that this would be someone's really cool resume, but this is interesting, nonetheless.
by johnhenry 10y ago
I was hoping that this would be someone's really cool resume, but this is interesting, nonetheless.
- AtheistOfFail 10y agoWas actually hoping for an alternative to OpenCV that wasn't created in the 90s.
- bluefinity 10y agolibccv perhaps?
- zo1 10y agoDlib has a decent set of features, a few even better to OpenCV in my opinion. Though, at the end of the day, there is no reason why you can't use both.
- mynewtb 10y agoWhat problems do you see with opencv?
- AtheistOfFail 10y agoNothing, actually, it's a quality library, just old. I can think of a few algorithms that have changed or been created since the 1990s so I have to assume there's something that can be done to optimize it. There's also a severe lack of "in-browser" CV solutions (which could be fun), instead opting for binding OpenCV in the server-side.
- ojii 10y agoSame, I expected it to be someones resume built in the unreal engine.
- fnordsensei 10y agoSame here. I was thinking of how long it would take us before the inflation in fancy CVs and resumés would force recruitment agencies to invest in rendering farms and full-body VR suits in order to read job applications.
- TorKlingberg 10y agoI don't mean to criticise you personally, because I have done the same thing, but: Comments about what someone thought the title meant are very common and not interesting in any way.
- johnhenry 10y agoI disagree. Most of the reason that people click on anything on this site is directly because of the title, so if I have particular expectations that the title fails to meet, then it's fair game for commenting. I don't think it's fair to assert that what you find common and uninteresting is irrelevant to someone else.