3 ms·
This may be insensitive but is the name too close to "coma" given the odds that one of their users will end up in one (through the product's fault or not)?
by BWStearns 10y ago
This may be insensitive but is the name too close to "coma" given the odds that one of their users will end up in one (through the product's fault or not)?
- philplckthun 10y agoWow! Slow down there, Satan. I can already see the headlines.
- BWStearns 10y agoReally now, Satan? That's all I had to do to get the top job in hell? Do I get to be the second coming for holding elevator doors when I'm in a rush? I was just questioning the wisdom of passing out the free headline tragedy-puns with your branding. It would be an equally terribly name for a line of DIY transcranial direct current stimulation kits. Again, it's not because these products are dangerous[0], but that they will likely be perceived that way. Any possible blame will be laid at their feet at least through innuendo, so why make it easy and catchy? [0] I make no assertion about the actual safety of either.
- cpach 10y agoMy first thought as well...