3 ms·
> Per the article Not quite, it says "If the attacker has a bigger fire hose of data than the defender has, the attacker wins" and "the size and scale of these
by m0nty 10y ago
> Per the article
Not quite, it says "If the attacker has a bigger fire hose of data than the defender has, the attacker wins" and "the size and scale of these probes—and especially their persistence—points to state actors" which is not quite the same as saying you need to own the bandwidth. For example, DNS amplification can be used "to turn initially small queries into much larger payloads, which are used to bring down the victim’s servers".
https://www.incapsula.com/ddos/attack-glossary/dns-amplification.html https://www.incapsula.com/ddos/attack-glossary/dns-amplifica...
So maybe there are other techniques which might allow for similar leverage. Neither is the article conclusive about "state actors", they are merely "pointed to". As for expertise ... I don't doubt there are people out there who have it or might acquire it. So it's still an interesting question imo.
- AnimalMuppet 10y agoOK, perhaps I phrased it slightly wrong. I can't play, because I don't have the bandwidth or the expertise. I think that most of us on this board are in that category. (There's expertise here, but most of it isn't on the level of these attacks.)