3 ms·
You don't need to look there, at all. Just look at the US aggressive wars and subversive activities in this century, e.g. Iraq, Libya and it becomes clear that
by igivanov 10y ago
You don't need to look there, at all. Just look at the US aggressive wars and subversive activities in this century, e.g. Iraq, Libya and it becomes clear that the value of human rights abroad from the US point of view is exactly 0.
- threeseed 10y agoIraq was a disgrace but bringing up Libya means you are either ignorant or being disingenuous. Gaddafi had imminent plans to commit another cleansing of the opposition. It was always going to be a lose-lose situation for human rights. Doing nothing is not always the right answer.
- babayega2 10y agoIt's better to state the reality not the myth sold by USA : Ghadafi wasn't about to commit anything else than what US allies have already done. Now Libya is a failed state thanks to US and HRW lies.
- stana 10y agoSo how do you rate the situation in Libya before and after Gaddafi?
- fdgdasfadsf 10y agoBad with him there. Much worse with him gone.
- igivanov 10y agoBy calling Iraq a disgrace you are effectively calling the 9/11 a micro-disgrace. That's how these two differ in the order of numbers of lives lost.