4 ms·
You don't need to make the ailment public. Simply the exception that was granted. If it's okay to to report when athletes are banned from a sport due to substa
by parennoob 10y ago
You don't need to make the ailment public. Simply the exception that was granted.
If it's okay to to report when athletes are banned from a sport due to substance X in their blood/urine (e.g. sooo many cyclists and EPO), surely it should be okay to report that "substance X will be found, but this time they are being given an exception".
- dogma1138 10y agoThat's the same thing it's like reporting some one is taking a cocktail of anti virals instead of saying they got AIDS. Steroids and other banned substances are constantly perscribed for medical issues and if an athlete takes a steroid cream for something that would appear on the exception list.
- Udik 10y agoI'm sorry, but I think that if you want to run on a track against the best in the world while everybody else is watching, you have to be willing to give up some privacy. Basically the world becomes interested in how your body works and you have to let them know.