2 ms·
> Remember all of their one-off, over the top, skeuomorphic apps? I actually liked those a lot. They were the only things I've seen in my adult life that broug
by amyjess 10y ago
> Remember all of their one-off, over the top, skeuomorphic apps?
I actually liked those a lot. They were the only things I've seen in my adult life that brought back the sense of fun and whimsy I had when I first used a Mac as a little kid.
Even though I never actually bought one (because I don't like walled gardens), I used to go into the Apple Store often just to play with the skeumorphic apps on the iPad. If iOS wasn't such a walled garden, I probably would have bought an original iPad just to play with those apps at home.
> Anyone else miss WindowShade?
Oddly enough, I've seen it pop up on Linux desktops for ages. It's still part of KDE, and even in 2016 I can shade my windows by double-clicking on the titlebars like God intended.
- haroldp 10y ago> > Remember all of their one-off, over the top, skeuomorphic apps? > I actually liked those a lot. I also liked them, and I think skeuomorphism is a good idea, generally. And I think iOS's completely anti-skeuomorphic abstraction is a bad idea, generally. And I get why Chrome ate my title bar. But is it a good idea for users to have to learn different UI metaphors for every app? I feel like one of classic MacOS's real strengths was that there was ONE UI and users were really skeptical of any app that broke the rules. > > Anyone else miss WindowShade? > Oddly enough, I've seen it pop up on Linux desktops for ages. If memory serves, that feature originally came from Linux/X-Windows, was added to MacOS as an extension first, and then incorporated in the official OS. (And then discarded)