3 ms·
Well, for one thing, this isn't even attempting an objective comparison. The article basically grabs whatever third party benchmark numbers are available and pr
by polyfractal 10y ago
Well, for one thing, this isn't even attempting an objective comparison. The article basically grabs whatever third party benchmark numbers are available and pretends all the metrics are comparable. In many cases, the external benchmarks are testing entirely different things, so it's meaningless to give those numbers in a "review" of all the options.
It's really just a "top ten list according to my arbitrary thoughts", which is fine. But it's not really a useful comparison at all.