24 ms·
I though uBlock point was to be CPU/ram efficient ? That's even what they show in the chrome/firefox store images, it doesn't make much sense to me that it add
by maxencecornet 10y ago
I though uBlock point was to be CPU/ram efficient ?
That's even what they show in the chrome/firefox store images, it doesn't make much sense to me that it adds several seconds to Firefox startup time
Am I missing something ?
- artursapek 10y agoI've found uBlock to be much faster than ABP
- thesmallestcat 10y agoWhile it's running it seems smooth and efficient, or at least not a bear like Ghostery. It's something with startup. Anyway, minor nit, it's a great extension.
- gorhill 10y ago> Am I missing something ? Be skeptical of claims which come with no technical details whatsoever to help you reproduce it?