3 ms·
FTA "When I told people I was going to Cuba, the reaction was predictable. I was told I was lucky to witness Cuba because it was ‘”untouched.” I was told somet
by miller_joe 10y ago
FTA
"When I told people I was going to Cuba, the reaction was predictable. I was told I was lucky to witness Cuba because it was ‘”untouched.” I was told something along the lines of: “Oh, you get to see Cuba before Starbucks and McDonald’s go down and ruin it all.” I heard the same thing from some Americans I met at El Floridita. I confess part of me shared in this naive romanticism about Cuba, that somehow there is a ‘purity’ to Cuba that will soon be ‘corrupted.’ I was wrong about this. Not only because of my naiveté about the condition on the ground in Cuba, but because of the insidiousness such a belief implies about what the Cuban people want and deserve.
“Untouched” is a romantic way to look at the poverty that Cuba has become. There is nothing romantic about poverty. Poverty is sad. Poverty is sick children and malnourishment. Poverty is no books or school supplies. Poverty is no toilet paper, no soap, no toothpaste, no clean water, and unmet basic needs. Poverty is constant exposure to punishing heat and humidity. Poverty is torn up shoes and broken cars. Poverty is dangerous tools and equipment. Worst of all, poverty is wasted human capital: time spent waiting on lines for food instead of producing goods and services to better society. Poverty is unwritten literature, unsung music, unconducted experiments, undiscovered breakthroughs, and unfulfilled ambition."
- cmrdporcupine 10y agoWritten by someone who sounds like he should go spend some time in inner city Detroit, Baltimore, etc. etc. I've been to Cuba, off the beaten track, many times. Eaten home cooked meals in Cuban homes. Picked up hitchhikers and talked to the locals as best I could. etc. I've never seen anything there as sickeningly awful as the contrast between brutal Want and Decadence that characterizes the U.S. Can't stand smug libertarians. Really can't.
- andrenth 10y agoThere's no contrast because everyone is poor, quite lovely. Unless you consider of course the political elite, those who fight for the people while wearing Rolex watches and have them live on food rations. Then you'll see a lot of contrast.
- FrancoDiaz 10y agoIt's that same condescending attitude that you see westerners when they're talking about "tribes" people, and how they're untouched from the "evil, capitalist" world. Of course, it's also a political ideology that doesn't want to deal with reality