3 ms·
I'll take facts over context, but would be happy with both. I'm fully capable of figuring out the inflation adjusted number, but now we don't actually know what
by WillPostForFood 10y ago
I'll take facts over context, but would be happy with both. I'm fully capable of figuring out the inflation adjusted number, but now we don't actually know what they were paid.
I also guarantee you they we will see secondary reporting of this article, and the 50k number will be in it, and the inflation adjusted/today's dollars piece will get lost.
- r_smart 10y agoIf you can convert inflation adjusted to today's money, why can't you do it backwards? To your second point, you're probably right. Journalism is in a sad state these days.
- WillPostForFood 10y agoIt's not that you can't work in reverse and get an estimate, its just that you can't know if it is accurate. What if the journalist made a mistake in their inflation calculation? They are clearly rounding to the inflation adjusted number, and we don't know what year they received payment.
- r_smart 10y agoThat's a good point. Trusting your math of a selection of people that are typically bad at math, and that have a bad track record of accuracy in general, is probably not a good idea.