4 ms·
Sorry if the previous response was overly terse, but it seemed easiest to point out what you were doing with your own words. Namely, demonstrating the behavior
by r_smart 10y ago
Sorry if the previous response was overly terse, but it seemed easiest to point out what you were doing with your own words. Namely, demonstrating the behavior you're decrying.
Also, how is showing you sentences from different parts of your post being unable to process more than one sentence at a time? If you just wanted to match snark with snark, then fair enough, but as a refutation, it's a bit lacking. Rather, you seem to be making a veiled appeal to authority via having a readership / cult of personality based around you.