The author seems to be making the classic mistake of assuming everyone is coming to the material for the same reason. He is apparently past the stage of promis

The author seems to be making the classic mistake of assuming everyone is coming to the material for the same reason. He is apparently past the stage of promiscuity and was looking for help finding a true mate. The MM disappointed him. So now he's preaching against the MM itself, rather than against the MM as a tool to meet his particular goal. I bet if confronted about the contradiction, he'd claim he never meant to disparage the young using the MM to improve their own "youthful promiscuity" experience. Whether he'd change his article is another story. He'll clearly get more attention as it is.