3 ms·
This article seems like it belongs on some sleazy askmen.com type of site rather than the WSJ. There are a number of things wrong with the logic here. These ar
by zefhous 17y ago
This article seems like it belongs on some sleazy askmen.com type of site rather than the WSJ.
There are a number of things wrong with the logic here. These are sweeping generalizations that in my experience don't come close to reality. If there is any truth to this, I could see it only existing in select situations as described in the article like poker night or going to a football game with a group of men. People behave differently in groups than they do in one on one situations.
Also, as raju mentioned, I'm sure that a good amount of this is cultural. Even within western culture there are vastly differing cultural groups. Generalizations like this simply don't work, and I think it's harmful to entertain "stories" like this.
- wdewind 17y ago"This article seems like it belongs on some sleazy askmen.com type of site rather than the WSJ." Hit the nail on the head...to even be having comparisons on the level of men vs. women is showing a shocking lack of nuance for WSJ...