3 ms·
I think our definitions of meaningful are significantly different. I try to picture what the image would be like with a girls head atop a blurry body, and it se
by r_smart 10y ago
I think our definitions of meaningful are significantly different. I try to picture what the image would be like with a girls head atop a blurry body, and it seems to me a totally different thing. Her being naked is a key part of planting the disgust and horror in you that the photographer was aiming for.
Granted, seeing it censored might prompt you to go and look up the original image, prompting you to leave Facebook. So maybe I've changed my mind on the issue :)
- weberc2 10y ago> Her being naked is a key part of planting the disgust and horror in you that the photographer was aiming for. What else might pixelation or blurring mean in this context besides that she is naked?
- r_smart 10y agoIf you're trying to lead me to a specific idea, I'm not following, sorry. To answer you literally: Serious injury or mutilation, wearing some kind of propaganda the censor didn't want you to see, bawdy tattoos. Probably a million other things, but it would probably still be obvious it was because she was naked.
- weberc2 10y agoWasn't trying to lead you, I was just wondering if there could be another reasonable conclusion. Your answer seems to be confirming my suspicions.
- r_smart 10y agoMaybe, depends on how you did it. Like I initially thought of doing her whole body, but I guess you could just do the parts of her that makes it nudity, so it would be a censorship bikini. That would probably make it more obvious that she was naked, and I'm not really sure what that solves.