Better bad is not the same as good. The approach itself yielded the issues such as that you reference, which have only been partially resolved by subsequent it

Better bad is not the same as good. The approach itself yielded the issues such as that you reference, which have only been partially resolved by subsequent iterations of the same approach. I don't believe we should give credit for an approach that yields what is still a net-negative. It's a new thinking that we need, not reluctant acceptance of the best sub optimal execution the old thinking can deliver.