3 ms·
> Are there material ways that this lack of privacy hurts people... In the safety of your own privacy, you can let go of common expectations. Being constantly
by Red_Tarsius 10y ago
> Are there material ways that this lack of privacy hurts people...
In the safety of your own privacy, you can let go of common expectations. Being constantly recorded introduces a huge stressor, no matter how virtuous you are. You can't let go of past mistakes because other people certainly won't.
Lack of privacy in overcrowded prisons does kill people, mostly out of desperation. Convicts get extremely violent when their physical AND mental space is not respected. I believe privacy to be as important as any other needs after basic survival. http://www.npr.org/2016/03/24/470824303/doubling-up-prisoners-in-solitary-creates-deadly-consequences http://www.npr.org/2016/03/24/470824303/doubling-up-prisoner...
> ...or is it more anticipation of future harm?
"If you give me six lines written by the hand of the most honest of men, I will find something in them which will hang him." You're not human anymore, you're a walking narrative: a commie under McCarthy, a heretic in Renaissance Italy, a witch in 1597 Scotland, a queer in the Middle East. Ambitious people protect their privacy because they know anything can be turned against them. Authority lives and dies by mud-digging and scandals.
- marmot777 10y agoThe Cardinal Richelieu quote's chilling. That's got to be one of the most evil sentences uttered by humans.
- dragonwriter 10y ago> That's got to be one of the most evil sentences uttered by humans. Its a fairly matter-of-fact description of the state of law at the time. (Note that that statement itself -- though Richelieu himself was in a privileged enough position to have no concern -- could easily have been an example of the effect it described, as it suggested both that the King's law was evil in condemning the honest, and that the King's law was capriciously enforced, either of which could be lèse-majesté.)