4 ms·
Thanks for the comments, everyone! I don't really disagree on the "external factors" (getting a job, providing for your family, etc.). I think their role is o
by scritic 17y ago
Thanks for the comments, everyone! I don't really disagree on the "external factors" (getting a job, providing for your family, etc.). I think their role is overwhelming, and I say that in the post too. My point is simply to consider the role of pedagogy (and contrast the pedagogies of non-mathematical subjects in high schools in the US and India) and wonder if that has a role to play in the fact that so many "bright" students in India end up being engineers and doctors.
Perhaps, there's also a relationship between the external factors (probability of getting a job, job prestige, etc.) in a developing country and the style of pedagogy in schools that cater to the middle class, although at this point, I can't really think of a mechanism that makes things the way they are.
- bluesmoon 17y agoI don't believe pedagogy has anything to do with it. I've had classmates who were really good at history and civics but only one of them went on to become a lawyer. The rest of them either became deck officers in the merchant navy or computer programmers. Both professions associated with a lot of money and foreign travel.