4 ms·
The one thing I'm surprised about is the external SSD for the 27" iMac. I can't see how it would be faster running the whole system through the Firewire bus.
by n8agrin 17y ago
The one thing I'm surprised about is the external SSD for the 27" iMac. I can't see how it would be faster running the whole system through the Firewire bus. Here are some throughput benchmarks of SSD drives I found from OWC (a well known Mac accessory online retailer):
7200 rpm external drive:
eSATA - http://eshop.macsales.com/images/Items/OWCMEQM7500GB16/HIT0A72335/eSATA.png http://eshop.macsales.com/images/Items/OWCMEQM7500GB16/HIT0A...
FW800 - http://eshop.macsales.com/images/Items/OWCMEQM7500GB16/HIT0A72335/fw800.png http://eshop.macsales.com/images/Items/OWCMEQM7500GB16/HIT0A...
SSD external drive:
eSATA - http://eshop.macsales.com/images/Items/OWCMEQMSSD050/eSATA.png http://eshop.macsales.com/images/Items/OWCMEQMSSD050/eSATA.p...
FW800 - http://eshop.macsales.com/images/Items/OWCMEQMSSD050/fw800.png http://eshop.macsales.com/images/Items/OWCMEQMSSD050/fw800.p...
Summary:
Via eSATA, the 7200rpm drive tops out around 100MB/sec while the SSD drive hits > 200MB/sec. Via FW800 both drives only max out around 80MB/sec which is the approximate upper limit of FW800 I believe.
DHH, if you're reading perhaps you can provide a more subjective take on the real-world performance? I'm curious as I have a 27" iMac and would love to be able to get the SSD speed boost without taking off the glass and voiding warranties.
- dhh 17y agoThe main speed benefit of SSDs is not throughput, but random access speeds. That's what makes it feel so magically fast. SSD over FW800 still gives you that.
- orangecat 17y agoVery interesting. I've considered putting an SSD in my Mac mini, but opening them is a pain and I was under the vague impression that latency would suffer over Firewire. Glad to hear it works well, what enclosure are you using?
- n8agrin 17y agoI think I may give it a shot. Thanks for the feedback.