> You may think my question was a straw-man - it was intentionally leading actually, to set-up these following points. Bullshit. I could have just as easily re

> You may think my question was a straw-man - it was intentionally leading actually, to set-up these following points. Bullshit. I could have just as easily responded with "No." Give me a break. Of course I can't present any evidence I didn't work for Hostess, where am I supposed to get evidence from short of a whistleblower? My point isn't that I'm saying 100% this is what happened, I'm saying I'm skeptical of the story being sold that the union is at fault and the executives did all they could to save the company, etc. I'm not interested in any more discussion with you, so this will be my last response.