4 ms·
The whole idea of a state of nature being "nasty, brutish and short" has long been debunked by many anthropologists. The original affluence theory derived from
by thrownblown 10y ago
The whole idea of a state of nature being "nasty, brutish and short" has long been debunked by many anthropologists. The original affluence theory derived from ethnographic studies of the !kung bushmen in the 50's and 60's (the guy in the gods must be crazy) asserts that early man worked like 15-20 hrs a week.
- Turing_Machine 10y ago"asserts that early man worked like 15-20 hrs a week." I'm pretty sure you could afford a bare subsistence level diet today, with no heat, running water, electricity, modern medical care, etc. (i.e, a !Kung-level lifestyle) by working less than 15 hours per week. And you wouldn't have to put up with Guinea worms, either. Let's see... rice costs about $1.00/pound, and has about 600 calories per pound. Let's be really generous and say 3,000 calories per day. So $5/day for raw calories. Add in $0.89/head for iceberg lettuce (for fiber), $3.00 for a chicken breast (protein) and a few cents for a multivitamin pill and you're looking at around $9.00/day. Maybe an hour and a half at minimum wage, or roughly 10 hours per week. Would this be a healthy diet? No. Would it be an enjoyable diet? No. But you could survive on it for quite a long time.