3 ms·
It seems the author is trying to do classical OOP using traits (type classes). They aren't a match although the similarities. I understand his rant, but I don'
by fungos 10y ago
It seems the author is trying to do classical OOP using traits (type classes). They aren't a match although the similarities.
I understand his rant, but I don't think it is a valid one.
You must change your design or change your tool, he opted to change the tool.
- firebones 10y agoI hit the same wall, and opted to learn a new way of design after years of slavishly adhering to OOP. There's not much that I miss from OOP, and I now see its utility as more about making the ability to program scale predictably with an unpredictable workforce.