4 ms·
I don't see how the fact that some human can do it can be used to justify the properties of another human. Are you rich because Bill Gates is rich? It doesn't
by joesb 10y ago
I don't see how the fact that some human can do it can be used to justify the properties of another human. Are you rich because Bill Gates is rich?
It doesn't matter if all robot can't or that some human can, because we are judging an individual. So if Spooner can't do it, yet he still thinks he has some value than the robot, then clearly it's not ability to compose symphony that matters.
- Synaesthesia 10y agoThe creative faculty is much more than just composing symphonies though, the simple act of speaking, is a creative process. Every time you speak your utterances can be arbitrarily long, and unique - have probably never been expressed, in that particular order. So that's something all humans can do.
- pixl97 10y agoAnd something AI does too https://www.engadget.com/2016/09/10/google-deepmind-ai-wavenet-text-to-speech/ https://www.engadget.com/2016/09/10/google-deepmind-ai-waven...
- Synaesthesia 10y agoIt can mimic a human voice but not synthesise novel sentences of arbitrary length - which are actually meaningful - the creative process of speech. Check Noam Chomsky on AI and the singularity, interesting viewpoints. This video is good. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kICLG4Zg8s https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0kICLG4Zg8s