3 ms·
This particular aircraft ain’t economical by today’s standards. Here’s some comparison to a popular modern cargo plane, based on public data: https://1drv.ms/x/
by Const-me 10y ago
This particular aircraft ain’t economical by today’s standards.
Here’s some comparison to a popular modern cargo plane, based on public data: https://1drv.ms/x/s!AKpTxXHPN4XIj9tN https://1drv.ms/x/s!AKpTxXHPN4XIj9tN
As you see, fuel economy is somewhat worse compared to that Boeing.
I don’t think the main problem is size or weight. I think the main one is age. AN-255 is 30 years old, Boeing 747-8 is 6. That’s almost 25 year or progress in aerodynamics and engines development.
- blakeyrat 10y agoThe unassembled one pictured towards the bottom of the article seems to have some refinements to the design, not being built with the requirement to haul the Buran around-- they mention a single tail specifically. It might not be as out-of-date as you'd assume.