5 ms·
The author addresses it in the essay. Flooding comes in the form of storms every X years and super-high, rare tides, so barriers don't help. If storms are unfre
by tajen 10y ago
The author addresses it in the essay. Flooding comes in the form of storms every X years and super-high, rare tides, so barriers don't help. If storms are unfrequent enough, people keep occupying the area. In Manhattan, they've already thought about a barrier on the Hudson river, but it's prohibitively expensive, covers a few percent of the risks only, and worse, gives people the feeling that there's a solution. Plus they may solve the 2070 problem, but few things solve the 2100 problem, and nothing solves the 2200 problem: When the water is 30 feet higher, you just have to transform NYC into New Venice.
Which makes me think, a change of name into "New Venice" might help people identify better with the new situation than every barrier.
- blue1 10y agoThe funny thing is that Venice, I mean the original one in Italy, seems also totally uninterested in this problem. After decades of discussion they have finally built these mobile barriers between the sea and the lagoon, which are supposed to protect the city from the periodic high tides ("acqua alta"). But apparently no one is thinking what will happen when the sea level will rise.
- gaadd33 10y agoWhy is it possible for the Netherlands to prevent flooding and reclaim land but not for New York City? Is there some inherent difference in geography?
- blahi 10y agoTokyo has solved this problem already. Random article I found, perhaps not the best. http://newlaunches.com/archives/a-tour-of-tokyos-alien-like-underground-temple-drains.php http://newlaunches.com/archives/a-tour-of-tokyos-alien-like-...