3 ms·
Disclaimer: I work in bioinformatics It's a bit of a weird thing to say that 'computational zoology' will be a field since zoology itself (and botany FWIW) has
by a_bonobo 10y ago
Disclaimer: I work in bioinformatics
It's a bit of a weird thing to say that 'computational zoology' will be a field since zoology itself (and botany FWIW) has become 'computational zoology'. Instead of comparing the way an arm looks or counting the number of stamen to delineate species, you now use molecular markers (SNPs, SSRs, gene presence/absence) to distinguish species, and you do that using computers instead of your magnifying glass. A recent example would be that 'giraffes are 4 species' paper - traditional zoologists had them down as one species based no the way they look, but the computer (DNA analysis) says they're four different ones.
Biology is really shifting away from the lab to the computer - people who used to do 100% lab-based work now do 50% computer-based, 50% lab-based work (mileage may vary).
- lacker 10y agoHmm. I guess it's not an example that helps my point, then - even if it's not called "computational zoology", you're basically saying zoology is moving in that direction. Ah well. "Computational archaeology" is a thing, but it doesn't seem like it's the future of archaeology. IANAA of course ;-) I'm just going off of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computational_archaeology https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computational_archaeology