1. not everything is done for money, I see no ads on this website for example 2. If your question is to know wether a journalist would be concerned by the deci

1. not everything is done for money, I see no ads on this website for example 2. If your question is to know wether a journalist would be concerned by the decision, it's easy to see he would not. 3. If the linker is linking to illegal content knowingly, and because he hopes a gain from it, I don't see how he would not be guilty. In your example, you would be guilty as hell. 4. Google don't know what is legal and what is illegal as long as nobody told them. They're protected in Europe as intermediaries by the Directive at least.