4 ms·
What an awful format for slides.
by creshal 10y ago
What an awful format for slides.
- divbit 10y agoBesides the fact that the font is really tiny, it's actually much nicer on phone than most of the "n things..." websites which seem to try and maximize clicks.
- hibbelig 10y agoThe font is _too_ tiny. I couldn't read the mono space parts.
- vacri 10y agoReally? It all looks perfectly legible for me on FF and Chrome, on both win + lin. It'd be even more so if fullscreened like you'd expect a slideshow to be presented.
- hibbelig 10y agoProbably, but the context here was mobile. The monospaced parts are too tiny on my iPhone 5c.
- divbit 10y agoShitty life pro tip : Get a pair of 2x glasses at the dollar store for all your phone reading needs.
- mrob 10y agoDisable CSS (in Firefox: View, Page Style, No Style) and the problem is solved.
- the_duke 10y agoI loved them, looks great, easy to read. Liked the animations too. Not too much, but looks good.
- coldtea 10y agoWhat exactly is awful about them?
- obsurveyor 10y agoIt seems great for presenting them but after the fact: Pollutes browser history(or if you click too fast, doesn't even have any), not convenient to browse at your own pace, no way to jump to a specific slide(visually) The formatting is really good too and would probably work great as an article format but you're stuck reading tidbits, going back and forth.
- coldtea 10y ago>Pollutes browser history(or if you click too fast, doesn't even have any) In what way browser history, usually full of tons of random items and webpages one has opened, should not be polluted? It's just a log, not some kind of organised curated list of webpages. >not convenient to browse at your own pace How so? I can click left/right and go wherever I want at whatever pace I like. >no way to jump to a specific slide(visually) That, I give you.