> No private company is considered required to promote or protect free speech They are liable to offer the service in good faith. If their service to the user

> No private company is considered required to promote or protect free speech They are liable to offer the service in good faith. If their service to the user is communication, then I don't see how that promises any less than free speech. Publication of pornography to minors is an offense, so it's not covered by free speech to begin with. The picture in question is not pornography.