> What's less attractive is Dogmatic Bikeshedding C++ OO Fundamentalism. Is that a thing? I always saw more of that in the Java world than C++ -- Java's standa

> What's less attractive is Dogmatic Bikeshedding C++ OO Fundamentalism. Is that a thing? I always saw more of that in the Java world than C++ -- Java's standard library is rife with the singleton factory decorator monstrosities that have come to be associated with OO, C++ and the standard library have always felt more generic-programy. Now egregious use of obscure template meta programming tricks because of perceived (vs measured) performance gains, I've seen some horrors there...