3 ms·
Your post further up in the thread: > Calling BO a backdoor is a major corruption of the word, as you loose the only word for describing intentionally weakened
by mordocai 10y ago
Your post further up in the thread:
> Calling BO a backdoor is a major corruption of the word, as you loose the only word for describing intentionally weakened security - so that you may describe a thing which already has several more explicitly defining names: malware, trojan, dropper, etc.
Thinking in that context, it sounded like you were arguing further for the fact that backdoors should only be describing intentionally weakened security. Have you changed your mind about that?
- woodman 10y ago> Have you changed your mind about that? No. Unlike a rootkit, context really matters in the case of a backdoor - not so much the implementation means. BO is no more a backdoor than vnc or sshd. Now if Dell decides to secretly package BO in their product line, then it is a backdoor. > ...backdoors should only be describing intentionally weakened security. I can't think of a backdoor that does not meet that description, do you have anything in mind?